JacobCheverie
Ultra Senior Member
Last Activity: Yesterday, 08:56 PM
Joined: 08-03-2018
Location:
-
As you'll be able to discover in the link above, your secondary datum is referenced at MMB, so, when computing the boundary size, PC-DMIS will use the... -
Your primary datum is an axis and thus there is no unique planar tolerance zone that can be established. You will need to define a secondary datum that...Leave a comment:
-
JacobCheverie commented on [email protected]'s to 2020 R2 Geometric Tolerance migration help thread.What is the actual dimension that you are trying to report? Symmetry, position, profile, etc...? What are your considered features and what are your datum... -
I run PC-DMIS and Calypso on a Zeiss Contura G2. I am still running PC-DMIS 2016 and, if I am not mistaken, there are regular updates to PC-DMIS that...Leave a comment:
-
I dug into it a little bit deeper. The XactMeasure dialog window appears to pull the tolerance zone direction as the THEO vector of the feature. Make...Leave a comment:
-
What version of PC-DMIS are you running?
What you're doing should work. Choose the planar feature and set the tolerance zone direction (as...Leave a comment:
-
Nice idea. -
Kp61dude! I'm not sure if this is what you are referring to, but check out the programmable search engine powered by Google that Hexagon has on their... -
NinjaBadger Is correct. The new Geometric Tolerance command (featured in PC-DMIS 2020 R2 and beyond) will report the MEAS value of a profile specification...Leave a comment:
-
Is it going below the surface by an amount equal to the probe radius? That's what the image looks like.Leave a comment:
-
Legacy dimensioning will report the feature size using the fitting algorithm selected in the feature definition. XactMeasure worked the same way.
...Last edited by JacobCheverie; 05-28-2021, 10:37 AM.Leave a comment:
-
Geometric Tolerance still has the option between reporting the measured data in the coordinate system formed by the DRF or in the current alignment. It... -
Let me elaborate a bit - We can only change the nominals at the feature level now as they can no longer be changed at the dimension level. -
KIRBSTER269 is correct. XactMeasure has been replaced with the new Geometric Tolerance command. You can no longer change nominals at the dimension level.... -
Alvin_A2 That's not what I was saying. XactMeasure used to report "Datum Shift" which told you how PC-DMIS was applying optimizations. For example,... -
This is part of the reason why the datum shift values were important. If you processed your measured data through PC-DMIS post 2020 R2, I'll bet you would've...Leave a comment:
-
What are A and B? I wonder if the pattern itself is responsible for a rotational constraint, hence the smaller values when reporting each hole separa...Leave a comment:
-
Do you have "Guess Mode" turned on? It is the question mark on the measured features toolbar.Leave a comment:
No activity results to display
Leave a comment: