neil.challinor
Ultra Senior Member
Joined: 11-08-2012
Location: Hexagon UK
-
Ok, that's great. I was due to present at that user group meeting myself but had to drop out at the last moment due to health issues. I'm sure Rob did... -
It depends on how tight the size & form tolerance is for the datums, your point spacing / hit density and how accurate your CMM & sensor is. ...Last edited by neil.challinor; 08-04-2022, 01:48 PM. -
Vantage Have you read the information in the help file?
This section talks about the differences between math types and how your machine/sensor... -
The screenshot of the edit window showed what the problem is - it says that one of your datums is invalid because it does not constrain any additional...Leave a comment:
-
Depends what you mean by "oblong" shaped - we'd need to see a picture. First thoughts are that it's probably either an ellipse or a round ...Leave a comment:
-
Runout encompasses both form and location so you will never get a smaller value for runout than you do for circularity. Since you say your circularity...Last edited by neil.challinor; 07-29-2022, 04:35 AM.Leave a comment:
-
so in a alignment i dont have a cad model...so what would be the best way to create a alignment..by hand with just a part...its a rectangle -
In my experience, the two points that control rotation would normally be line-contacts on the leading edge and the final point controlling translation... -
That sounds like the most likely scenario. I have come across this type of requirement on turbine blade drawings before. The idea is to "balance"...Leave a comment:
-
You cannot turn off the size when reporting MMC / LMC because the size is needed for the bonus calculation....Leave a comment:
-
Create two report labels - pass and fail. They can be as simple as a textbox with the word "PASS" or "FAIL" in it and the background...Leave a comment:
-
When you generate a scan from the CAD model, the hits will be populated from the CAD surface values. This means that normally, when you are working offline,...Leave a comment:
-
No, you have to have both because per unit is a refinement of the main tolerance. I would query it with the designer because it sounds like a mistake... -
2022.1 does not use XactMeasure, it was replaced with the geometric tolerance command in 2020 R2 - I should have noticed from your earlier screenshot....Leave a comment:
-
What version are you using? I think we added support for per unit around 2018 (2018 R2 maybe?)Leave a comment:
-
You can only apply per unit to profile of a line, and only when there are no datums referenced. There should be a "per unit" check box below...Leave a comment:
-
See this section of the automation objects help file: https://docs.hexagonmi.com/pcdmis/20...plication.html
This is a section of code from...Last edited by neil.challinor; 07-21-2022, 04:27 AM.Leave a comment:
-
Go into EDIT>Graphics Display Window>OPENGL and then select the Symbols tab. At the bottom, there should be a setting for path line thickness.Leave a comment:
-
Never going to happen. -
OK, that sounds like one of the things we fixed recently. Give it a try in the 2022.2 tech preview if you're signed up for it - it should all work correctly...
No activity results to display
Leave a comment: