I don't see that you ever leveled to the cylinder. Level to whatever is the Datum.
When checking perpendicularity be sure to select the feature first, then the Datum. Look to make sure you are not extending the reference length of the cylinder or plane.
BTW, for constructing the cylinder I select the points in a 'spiral order' from one end to the other.
Perpendicularity, oh the horror
Collapse
X
-
Please find attached the portion of my program that I am having trouble with.Attached Files
Leave a comment:
-
Are you using autofeatures or "learned points" (taking hits manually)? I also rarely have a cad model, but have learned much from the folks here and at PC-DMIS.com . The direction, number and order your points are taken. For a cylinder I take a minimum of 9 points. Four on the top level, four on the bottom and 1 in the middle. If you can, post the part of your program giving you problems. All of us will try to help!
Leave a comment:
-
I have a similar issue but much more severe. It seems there is little support for those who do not use CAD models. I cannot get proper hight measurements, concintricity, even diameters are going heywire. 12" out of round is not an uncommon error im getting on a part thats round within .001"
Leave a comment:
-
I have 2 thoughts. On this that is.
1) Make sure your projection distance is zero.
2) How straight and round is your cylinder? I know if you call out parallelism of 2 planes, the flatness of both planes will affect the results. It might be similar with perpendicularity.
Just some my 2 cents.
Leave a comment:
-
Chew on this for a minute.
I constructed a plane perpendicular to the afore mentioned cylinder.
The two planes are parallel within .0015.
How could this be?
Thanks in advance
Fred
Leave a comment:
-
I did that. None of the points deviate by more than a thousandth or two.
Leave a comment:
-
Hello,
The problem most likely lies within the alignment. Measure several points on the plane and it should show how the alignment may be skewed.
Hope this helps,
A.Gore
Leave a comment:
-
Perpendicularity, oh the horror
Oh good sirs:
I measured a cylinder. I leveled to that cylinder. I measured a plane. I dimensioned the plane's perpendicularity to that cylinder. It measured about .02”. However, no single point on that plane measure more than .002” from any other point. Why would there be such a large discrepancy????
Thanks
FredTags: None
Related Topics
Collapse
-
by MFCguyI am having some troubles with a perpendicularity measurement. I am measuring two circles and construction a cylinder to get the centerline/ axis. I then...
-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
03-21-2007, 04:36 PM -
-
by Sl33stakLet's say I am measuring the location of a cylinder. When the dimensioning is done is the measurement taken from the center point along the axis and length...
-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
06-26-2008, 02:16 PM -
-
by MarkusI am attempting to dimension the few cylinders on this door that are cut with a 15 degree angle on them and then welded to the bent plate. Previously,...
-
Channel: PC-DMIS Portable
10-09-2015, 11:23 AM -
-
by Slug DawsonImagine an empty beer mug lying on it's side. However, the handle of the mug doesn't drive straight toward the center of the mug, it's at a slight angle....
-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
02-05-2010, 03:30 PM -
-
by 12345I have a cylinder at a 65 degree angle in the X/Y plane,
I do not believe I can rely on the cylinder reporting at the theoretical location along...-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
01-07-2009, 12:26 PM -
Leave a comment: