I just spent a few days doing some training with a client on Ver 4.2
Let me start by saying, I wasn't all that happy with the new "Toys".
The report, I guess thats ok, remember "Hyper reporting" and all its hype on ver 3.5 ?? Where is it now ? Hmmmm?
Who's idea was it to seperate the auto features with a seperate box for settings. Very cumbersome and a pain in the $ss. Easy to forget what your settings are.
I have never been, nor ever will be a fan of the "Newer and improved" window layout, but its here to stay. This version and its "toys" do not impress me.
It seems like Hexagon is trying to add more features to "simplify" the operation of Pc-dmis so that "Anyone" can run it.
ITS AN ENGINEERING BASED SOFTWARE, it will always take someone with brains to use it, stop trying to make it simpler !!!! In doing this, you have created a cumbersome, unstable software, what used to be great, is getting poor.
Anyone can push a button and make the CMM move and take points, its all the other stuff that is most important. Interpretation of data, alignment interpretation, I could go on and on forever. There is alot more ways to check something incorrectly, many less to do it right. You have to have someone with the knowledge to decipher the difference.
Ok, I am done.
Let me start by saying, I wasn't all that happy with the new "Toys".
The report, I guess thats ok, remember "Hyper reporting" and all its hype on ver 3.5 ?? Where is it now ? Hmmmm?

Who's idea was it to seperate the auto features with a seperate box for settings. Very cumbersome and a pain in the $ss. Easy to forget what your settings are.
I have never been, nor ever will be a fan of the "Newer and improved" window layout, but its here to stay. This version and its "toys" do not impress me.
It seems like Hexagon is trying to add more features to "simplify" the operation of Pc-dmis so that "Anyone" can run it.
ITS AN ENGINEERING BASED SOFTWARE, it will always take someone with brains to use it, stop trying to make it simpler !!!! In doing this, you have created a cumbersome, unstable software, what used to be great, is getting poor.
Anyone can push a button and make the CMM move and take points, its all the other stuff that is most important. Interpretation of data, alignment interpretation, I could go on and on forever. There is alot more ways to check something incorrectly, many less to do it right. You have to have someone with the knowledge to decipher the difference.
Ok, I am done.
Comment