I am having some drawings in which base of the part is primary Datum-A. Datum-A is having 4 same diameter holes. I find center of patern of 4 holes by constructing circle passing through origin of holes. True position of circle is o.3 mm. with reference to Datum-A . Whenever, I tried to find True position by Datum feature frame, it does not give me measured value. It always shows measured value 0, and dot in the picture of True position stays in center. However, Legacy dimension gives me right measured value for this True position. It looks like, when I have to find True position of only one feature at once with reference to only primary Datum-A, Datum feature frame is not helpful, but it can be determined by Legacy dimension. Datum feature frame is helpful and finds the measured value of True position with reference to only Datum-A when I had to find True position of more than one hole of same size at once. Any feed back? How could I determine True position of circle with reference to only Datum-A by Datum feature frame (non Legacy).
True position for only one feature has to be done by Legacy.
Collapse
X
-
In using TP in Xact, you have to define the datum in the program. Once you've defined the datum, you can pick the features you want to reference back to that datum. Once you've done that, you can pick what parameters you want to measure out. If you're picking the bolt circle as a feature of reference, then you need to construct the bolt circle and pick the construction as a feature to reference against the datum. Or you can pick each individual hole to get the true position. The numbers will be the same in both legacy or xact. If not, you have a bad alignment.Darroll
2018R2
Comment
-
If FCF (Feature Control Frame, not Datum Feature Frame by the way) is for single holes (i.e. each hole has it's own FCF) and these are on top of the part (with datum A being the base) and you've measured them as circles then they will all report zero.
Each hole is being best-fit in X&Y as there are no other constraints. In legacy I imagine you're simply reporting to the coordinate system - if you select Fit to Datums they will also report zero.
Let us see the drawing and we'll advise you on how to approach it.Automettech - Automated Metrology Technology
Comment
-
Just to elaborate a bit here - If you are asking for the position of a circle to a plane where the circle is in a plane parallel to the datum plane, the result will always be 0. The intention of a position control with the single primary datum reference is to control perpendicularity. To determine, you need to measure cylinders.
It sounds like you have a pattern of four holes. Measuring as circles will yield the relative positional error if evaluated appropriately (simultaneously) but will ignore any and all perpendicularity error.
Measure the four holes as cylinders and select all four in a single XactMeasure command.
-
-
Originally posted by Jignesh View PostDrawing attached. Will add few more.
Comment
-
When I use Feature control frame and try to find T.P. of only one hole. It shows True position value 0. I had to select all 4 holes at once in one Feature control frame to find True position so that FCF was able to give me measured value of True position. Do you know why it is happening in FCF?
Comment
-
With one hole and "fit to datums=on" PC-DMIS will likely rotate and translate so the TP is at its best = 0. With two or more holes, PC-DMIS is trying to rotate and translate so the sum of all errors ends up as small as possible (I think).PC-DMIS CAD++ 2o19 R1 SP11
Comment
-
As vpt.se says, it behaves differently when reporting a single hole as opposed to a group of holes because of the different rules in play. Your drawing calls for the holes to be reported as a pattern so you should select all four in a FCF position command. Dimensioning them individually would not control the relationship between the holes and would be wrong in this case - you could end up passing parts as acceptable when in reality they have failed and would not assemble correctly.Attached FilesLast edited by neil.challinor; 03-05-2021, 04:57 AM.
- 1 like
Comment
Related Topics
Collapse
-
by JigneshI measured true position of two different size holes with legacy dimension and Datum feature frame. The True position meet specification by Datum feature...
-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
02-04-2016, 03:22 PM -
-
by JigneshThe drawing shows True position of all slots with no Datum. Is it possible to find with out Datum? I created other True position, but I have not...
-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
02-28-2021, 02:47 PM -
-
by JigneshI need to find True position of 0.2 with reference to Datum-A and Datum-c that is located near by slots located in drawing. Datum-A is the bottom of...
-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
02-24-2021, 08:46 PM -
-
by Onehot82hello all. i am having an issue dimensioning true position. the dimension calls for true position .010" max material condition to datum -h-/ datum...
-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
12-18-2012, 02:32 PM -
-
by Mike RuffI was reading thru the ASME Y14.5-2009 handbook and came across something I haven't really paid much attention to before. In Section 7.4.2, it says...
-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
03-09-2020, 01:07 PM -
Comment