Good morning all. I do not use TOTAL RUNOUT hardly at all. I refreshed myself up a little. Just to make sure I'm doing this right. I have a 4.0x4.0x1.0 thick part with a .500" thru hole and then a 3/4" counter bore .500" deep. I measured a circle 7 points on each end of the thru hole and counter bore and created 2 cylinders out of each set. Then a done a TOTAL RUNOUT from cylinder to cylinder. Is that legit? The alignment is not in the equation or does it need to be.
Total Runout
Collapse
X
-
Well, what are the drawing requirements? I don't quantify anything that isn't absolutely necessary for product acceptance. Does your print have total runout (two arrows connected at bottom)?
What is the defined datum in the FCF (as total runout obligates a datum reference)?
What is the stated tolerance?
Do you feel 2x 7-point circle cuts is enough of a representation of the feature to determine pass/fail?
-
Originally posted by louisd View PostWell, what are the drawing requirements? I don't quantify anything that isn't absolutely necessary for product acceptance. Does your print have total runout (two arrows connected at bottom)?
What is the defined datum in the FCF (as total runout obligates a datum reference)?
What is the stated tolerance?
Do you feel 2x 7-point circle cuts is enough of a representation of the feature to determine pass/fail?sigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by Douglas View Postif the length of your constructed cylinder is the length between your two circles... not the full length of the cylinder, that will affect the result if that is the case. Total runout would need to consider the entire length of the featuresigpic
Comment
-
Originally posted by vpt.se View PostYou should be able to construct a cylinder from the HITS of the four circles though.sigpic
Comment
-
$$ NO,
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The center 1.0642 counter borehole
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CIR1 =FEAT/CONTACT/CIRCLE/DEFAULT,CARTESIAN,IN,LEAST_SQR
THEO/<0,0,0>,<1,0,0>,1.0642
ACTL/<0,0,0>,<1,0,0>,1.0642
TARG/<0,0,0>,<1,0,0>
START ANG=15,END ANG=165
ANGLE VEC=<0,1,0>
DIRECTION=CW
SHOW FEATURE PARAMETERS=NO
SHOW CONTACT PARAMETERS=NO
CIR2 =FEAT/CONTACT/CIRCLE/DEFAULT,CARTESIAN,IN,LEAST_SQR
THEO/<-0.2517,0,0>,<1,0,0>,1.0642
ACTL/<-0.2517,0,0>,<1,0,0>,1
TARG/<-0.2517,0,0>,<1,0,0>
START ANG=165,END ANG=15
ANGLE VEC=<0,1,0>
DIRECTION=CCW
SHOW FEATURE PARAMETERS=NO
SHOW CONTACT PARAMETERS=NO
CIR3 =FEAT/CONTACT/CIRCLE/DEFAULT,CARTESIAN,IN,LEAST_SQR
THEO/<-0.5034,0,0>,<1,0,0>,1.0642
ACTL/<-0.5034,0,0>,<1,0,0>,1
TARG/<-0.5034,0,0>,<1,0,0>
START ANG=15,END ANG=165
ANGLE VEC=<0,1,0>
DIRECTION=CW
SHOW FEATURE PARAMETERS=NO
SHOW CONTACT PARAMETERS=NO
CYL1 =FEAT/CYLINDER,CARTESIAN,IN,LEAST_SQR,NO
THEO/<-0.2892,0,0>,<-1,0,0>,1.0642,0.4284
ACTL/<-0.2892,0,0>,<-1,0,0>,1.0642,0.4284
CONSTR/CYLINDER,BF,CIR1,CIR2,CIR3,,
CYL1A =FEAT/CYLINDER,CARTESIAN,IN,LEAST_SQR,NO
THEO/<-0.2892,0,0>,<-1,0,0>,1.0642,0.4284
ACTL/<-0.2892,0,0>,<-1,0,0>,1.0642,0.4284
CONSTR/CYLINDER,BF,CIR1.HIT[1..CIR1.NUMHITS],CIR2.HIT[1..CIR2.NUMHITS],CIR3.HIT[1..CIR3.NUMHITS],,
I constructed the cylinder 2 ways and going to see the results when I run thissigpic
Comment
Related Topics
Collapse
-
by HirxmI need to measure run-out on the outer diameter of a round part at two different heights. The datum A-B is at the center of the part. I constructed a...
-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
04-09-2021, 02:50 PM -
-
by FCGomesNo idea if anyone can answer this or not.
I am having a problem with runout and total runout.
When I measure features off a combined datum,...-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
04-22-2009, 02:05 PM -
-
by VONDYIn 3.5 We Had The Runout Dimension, But In 4.1 They Call It Circular Runout Dimension. I Have A Part That I Am More Or Less Checking The Face Runout...
-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
10-04-2006, 12:34 PM -
-
by JoBLOCKRoughly speaking: runoutx2 = concentricity right?
Example. round part. I am chucking on the OD checking the runout of the ID
...-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
03-30-2009, 02:55 PM -
-
by PowerJunkieStrangest thing... I'm used to models being perfect so when I see deviation it throws up a HUGE red flag.
The requirement is Runout .001"...-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
01-24-2019, 10:01 AM -
Comment