Gap on Linear-Closed Scan

[Hirxm]

Hello, I scanned a small tool once but this gap located between the start and end points is bothering me. The part is pretty small, around 15mm long. I had scanned another part some time ago which was a little longer and apparently the gap is also there. I just want to know if it's normal or if it's something I can somehow make disappear? If so, can anybody help me with that?

Thanks.

[RIDER]

Can you post the code with showing all parameters turned on?

[BKulpa]

It's dependent on your boundary type.
Try a cylinder boundary with 3 crossings and a radius slightly bigger than your probe radius.

[AndersI]

How can you have endpoints on a Linear-Closed scan?

As for the gap - are you using DEFINED? If so, the scanned points may be ignored if the part deviates too much (scanning in the air).

[Matthew D. Hoedeman]

How can you have endpoints on a Linear-Closed scan?

As for the gap - are you using DEFINED? If so, the scanned points may be ignored if the part deviates too much (scanning in the air).

it actually happens a lot, even on "no-cad", "no-find", "relearn" closed scans. I see it a lot on smaller holes, to the point that I change the crossings to 3 so that it will go around 1.5 times.