I have run into a problem which I cannot seem to figure out. I have to run a program 50 times for a capability study and so what I have done to make life easier is a double loop for a line of 4 parts. What I think is happening is when I run the program and it goes through the loop, it then offsets the manual alignment and measures the next part. If I make any changes to the program without disabling the loop and running it offline then all the alignments go out of whack and the probe will jump between the parts.
My solution is simply to do what I described, however, on the last part (written on 2014, I use 2015.1) this doesn't solve my problem. It measures the first part just fine, then after the offset, it measures a datum hole and moves to a round slot datum and when it takes a sample hit the probe moves all the way back to the first part.
When I Draw the path I see that this is the only place it does this, and it does it for each part after the first. That is, it takes the sample point and then goes back to the first part, then back to the part being measured.
Simply Removing the sample points on that slot then fixes the drawn path but crashes PC-DMIS when I run it on my machine.
I am done work for the day but I was hoping someone may have some insight based in my (admittedly long winded) description.
My solution is simply to do what I described, however, on the last part (written on 2014, I use 2015.1) this doesn't solve my problem. It measures the first part just fine, then after the offset, it measures a datum hole and moves to a round slot datum and when it takes a sample hit the probe moves all the way back to the first part.
When I Draw the path I see that this is the only place it does this, and it does it for each part after the first. That is, it takes the sample point and then goes back to the first part, then back to the part being measured.
Simply Removing the sample points on that slot then fixes the drawn path but crashes PC-DMIS when I run it on my machine.
I am done work for the day but I was hoping someone may have some insight based in my (admittedly long winded) description.
Comment