Best Fit Alignment - Rotating but Not Translating

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Best Fit Alignment - Rotating but Not Translating

    I am having an issue with a best fit rotation about Z, with translation in X and Y.
    The program seems to be rotating in Z, possibly translating in Y, but is not translating in X.

    I have already done a 2D progressive alignment (leveled to a Z plane, rotated about a X plane, and then translated the origin to the center of a cylinder).
    The reason for the best fit alignment is that the x plane is not consistently in the same place, or square to the center of the part.
    There is a profile "in the center" of the cylinder that is the actual feature being measured.
    I would like to ensure the origin is in the center of the profile, and rotated to match the CAD model to the physical part.

    Is there a particular trick or something that I am missing as to why the best fit alignment isn't translating in X (and possibly in Y)?

    Thank you and best regards,

    Ahb723

  • #2
    Best Fit "translates" differently than regular Origin: it automatically includes nominal offets to maintain the same nominals as the bestly-fitted features had in the previous coordinate system.

    Example: picture a block that's supposed to be 1" wide, but the factory made it 1.25" wide.
    Beep 1 point on left of block, set as Origin.
    Beep a 2nd point on right side of block, dimension Location and see that this point is deviation result +.25" from nominal - and of course the left point has zero deviation, being the origin and all.
    Now do a 2D Best Fit, using both points. Notice that the trihedron does NOT move to be in the middle of the points, but jumps a bit to the right - and when you make new Location dimensions for both points you see they are now showing deviation results like so: lefty is -.125" and righty is +.125". It equally shared the deviation between the two points.

    To Sum, "Best Fit" means "make a new coordinate system that gets these features actuals as close as possible to their nominals, equally sharing the deviation, but don't move the nominals."

    Comment


    • Ahb723
      Ahb723 commented
      Editing a comment
      Thank you for the explanation of how a "Best Fit" alignment works. It is certainly much clearer now.

      However, I am going to need to translate the origin in the X direction so that it is in the center of the part, to make the profile usable.
      If "Best Fit" isn't the correct alignment function to use, what would be? Iterative?

  • #3
    Thank you for the explanation of how a "Best Fit" alignment works. It is certainly much clearer now.

    However, I am going to need to translate the origin in the X direction so that it is in the center of the part, to make the profile usable.
    If "Best Fit" isn't the correct alignment function to use, what would be? Iterative?

    Comment

    Related Topics

    Collapse

    Working...
    X