Tweet
Been having a little trouble understanding the meaured data....The 2nd Segment of the composite (numbers) seem outrageously high. Have tried several attempts to get the numbers to coincide but to no avail. Maybe somebody can assist me on this endeavor?!!
-
-
give us a little more info BRI, circles or cylinders? are they perpendicular to A or Parallel?, I am assuming Composite.(In Memory of my Loving wife, "Ronda" who I lost March 7, 2016. I love you baby.)They say "Nobody's Perfect." I must be Nobody.
-
The cylinders are parallel to Datum A. Yes the Composite is giving me fits.
Maybe I have found the answer..........
It seems if I change the DRF to BAC with a composite to B, the numbers make more sense.
Last edited by brian.freeman; 07-02-2019, 02:38 PM.Comment
-
Can you show us both Trihedrons and how they are located on the part?
Capture.JPG
Maybe do an alignment, then start building your feature control frame.(In Memory of my Loving wife, "Ronda" who I lost March 7, 2016. I love you baby.)They say "Nobody's Perfect." I must be Nobody.Comment
-
This is what xact is trying to do vs. what the ABC alignment is. According to the engineering (Model) the DRF Should be ABC, but it gives me crazy numbers. Datum A is a Plane on bottom of the part, Datum B is 2 target poins on the contoured surface, Datum C is a target point, as seen in the picture.
Crazy thing is I have to delete pics to upload pics.Comment
-
Click On Customize to see what each Datum is controlling. If need be, change the control of X, Y, Z to your liking or need U controls X rotation, V is Y Rotation, and W is Z. It is very difficult to put stuff in the right area, because each frame has to be occupied by something and it has to make sense to the Demon.
Capture.JPG(In Memory of my Loving wife, "Ronda" who I lost March 7, 2016. I love you baby.)They say "Nobody's Perfect." I must be Nobody.Comment
-
The Demon defaults to what it thinks is correct. Most of the time it gets it right. I come across sometimes when it doesn't, One being The First Datum being Parallel to the feature, when an engineer does this, 9 times out of 10 he or she left a axis not being controlled at all, because of the second datum being parallel and they both control the same axis?
-
-
Hi all,
Here are a couple of callouts for reference. Would I be correct in saying that Xactmeasure won't properly evaluate the second half of the...06-11-2018, 01:07 PM -
To begin, I am using PC DMIS 2016 SP 7 with LEGACY DIMENSIONING.
On this part, items 1,2, & 3 (see attached picture) pertain to what...05-16-2018, 02:34 PM -
See the attachment.
I would like to see if other folks here agree with my interpretation of the Composite TP FCF in the attachment....06-03-2010, 06:44 PM -
I have had some just extreme variation on COMPOSITE POSITION on a recent part ('s). I will run the same part thru and have the composite position look...06-14-2012, 12:12 PM
-
Can anyone tell me how to dimension the composite position using v4.1?
I know we are looking for concentricty, but if I dimension using concentricty...07-06-2007, 04:07 PM
Comment