I have been with this latest company for just over a year. I have yet to see an "S" preceding Ø on a Position FCF. Many of the features that they are positioning are spherical. Am I being too hard on inspection by forcing parts to pass their tolerance in a spherical zone? It doesn't make sense to me why you would only control 2 components of position on something like a sphere.
Spherical tolerance zone question
Collapse
X
-
A spherical tolerance zone controls x,y & z.
B&S CHAMELEON/PCDMIS CAD++ V2011
There are no bugs, only "UNDOCUMENTED ENHANCEMENTS!"
sigpic
-
I understand that. What I said was there will be a Position callout on a sphere, but the FCF only shows Ø, not SØ. Do I assume they want spherical tolerance zone or a diametrical tolerance zone as the print suggests? If diametrical, which two dimensions are being controlled and what is the justification?
-
-
Without seeing the print or a sketch it is impossible to say if a spherical zone is needed.
At present we are running a part with a spherical end and all that is called out and needed for the function of the part
is a 2d zone the 3rd axis is open tolerance. Going to a spherical zone would serve no functional purpose and only add to
production cost and unnecessary scrap.
Comment
-
UKCMM I have attached a sketch. The Position with the arrow is the one in question. Should the tolerance zone be spherical or diametrical as drawn?
sketch.jpg
Comment
-
No. You can control its size and form with a spherical diameter and tolerance above the FCF, but not its orientation or location because you don't all 6 DOF locked up yet. All you have is a plane and a sphere to reference off of so far.
Comment
-
Mike Ruff is correct, -A- is a cylinder. I can determine -D- to -B- along X, and -D- to -A- along Y and Z, thus implying a spherical zone. But our prints have never shown spherical zones, only diametrical. I am beginning to believe that they just don't understand when/why to put SØ. I don't want to make that jump to conclusions myself though. What is the justification, can may must rule?
Comment
-
Originally posted by JacobCheverie View PostMike Ruff is correct, -A- is a cylinder. I can determine -D- to -B- along X, and -D- to -A- along Y and Z, thus implying a spherical zone. But our prints have never shown spherical zones, only diametrical. I am beginning to believe that they just don't understand when/why to put SØ. I don't want to make that jump to conclusions myself though. What is the justification, can may must rule?Systems Integrator
Hexagon Manufacturing Intelligence
- Likes 1
Comment
Related Topics
Collapse
-
by ATI-iaI am using version 4.2 and when i measure a circle using true position I get a target on my report. My question is, What exactly is this ploting.
...-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
07-07-2010, 09:52 AM -
-
by April11996
OK - not an April's fool.
Was just sent a print with the attached TP for an M10 threaded hole. I've not seen...-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
04-01-2015, 07:38 AM -
-
by Sl33stakLets say I have a hole true positioned on a print to say, .5mm. Also on the print I have the X and Y coordinates BOXED.
Now lets say that...-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
12-11-2008, 12:44 PM -
-
by keegoWhat's the difference in the following FCF's? (sorry, can't post print)
| Position | Ø1 | A m p 50 | B m |
| Position...-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
11-18-2007, 01:32 PM -
-
by T.DeCookDoes anyone have the formula to convert diametric to coordinate tolerance?
Thanks in advance!-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
08-29-2007, 07:58 AM -
Comment