i am trying to report MAX(GX) MIN(GN). Can someone tell me if I am using the function right? See attached. I am measuring the circle under LSQ. Report it using GX, GN and Diameter of location of circle and getting different results. Capture.PNG
reporting MAX(GX) MIN(GN)
Collapse
X
-
"You gave GX for both upper and lower." i gave it the +0.001/-0 dimension. Is that the right way of dimensioning it?Last edited by programmer; 04-24-2019, 10:35 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by programmer View Post"You gave GX for both upper and lower." i gave it the +0.001/-0 dimension. Is that the right way of dimensioning it?
From the PC-DMIS help file:
The Size command supports the following modifiers that are defined in the ISO 14405-1 standard:
(LP) - Two-point size
(GG) - Least-squares association criterion
(GX) - Maximum inscribed association criterion
(GN) - Minimum circumscribed association criterion
(CC) - Circumference diameter (calculated size)
(CA) - Area diameter (calculated size)
(CV) - Volume diameter (calculated size)
(SX) - Maximum size
(SN) - Minimum size
(SA) - Average size
(SM) - Median size
(SD) - Mid-range size
(SR) - Range of sizes
(E) - Envelope requirement
ACS - Any cross section or sections
SCS - Specific fixed cross section or sections
Whatever a man sows, he shall reap.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by programmer View PostSo when I measure the actual 0.0632 ID do I use Least_SQr or MAX_INSC? The customer wants to see GX and GN reporting for the 0.0632 ID. Can you show an example? I only have the LEAST_SQR in there just to see the difference.
Code:SIZE4 =SIZE/ OUTPUT=BOTH, UNITS=MM, STANDARD: ISO 14405-1, TOLERANCE SPECIFICATION MODE: NOMINAL_WITH_DEVIATIONS, NOMINAL SIZE: 27, UPPER TOLERANCE: 0.1,GN,__, LOWER TOLERANCE: 0.1,GX,__, UPPER SIZE: 27, LOWER SIZE: 27, FEATURE: A3_2
Code:SIZE4 =SIZE/ OUTPUT=BOTH, UNITS=MM, STANDARD: ISO 14405-1, TOLERANCE SPECIFICATION MODE: NOMINAL_WITH_DEVIATIONS, NOMINAL SIZE: 27, UPPER TOLERANCE: 0.1,SX,__, LOWER TOLERANCE: 0.1,SN,__, UPPER SIZE: 27, LOWER SIZE: 27, FEATURE: A3_2
Whatever a man sows, he shall reap.
Comment
-
I'm not at the cmm to check, but I think an old bug reappeared : min circ cylinder and max inscr cylinder have the same vector, and the same form defect.
I believe that's a bug which had been fixed long time ago (not sure of it).
If you look at the text values, there are only 4 values at 0 ( I think there should be 5 !).
If someone here can check it, maybe a new thread is needed (I'm off the cmm for a week...)
Comment
Related Topics
Collapse
-
Hello,
I`m measuring a setting ring diameter (nominal diam 69.994 mm) to check the touch-trigger probel lobbing error. I created an auto-circle...-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
03-04-2019, 08:16 AM -
-
by VikingroovinHello,
I have tried in vain to use the help file. seems to be more or less a no help file. can I report min and max Diameter or am I stuck...-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
02-24-2016, 10:29 AM -
-
by calbrittonI am measuring three circles on a part. I currently add these circles and report the average but I would also like to report the largest and smallest...
-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
04-24-2015, 06:02 PM -
-
by gcunniffI'm having an issue with hole diameter in a plastic injection part. The hole is out of round approx. 0.020" I've run a scan of the diameter and...
-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
04-18-2007, 10:55 AM -
-
by jakhillI am looking for the rule (standard) that would tell you when to report Max Inscribed diameter over Least Squared. I am reporting one way and the customer...
-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
08-25-2016, 10:06 AM -
Comment