Should Datum shift be enabled according to the print also how do I display the X and Y tolerance on the report for the position dimensions.
According to print specifications should I use datum shift?
Collapse
X
-
-
No datum shift. No bonus on size. Your FCF (Feature Control Frame) does not have MMC modifier affixed to the datums or the part.
You can display X/Y variation from basic if you (and your organization/customer) see fit, I do it as a report comment, so no dimensions are presented to apply to the basics.
-
ok so would this be a correct way to display the X&Y , my boss wants to be able to see the + and - tolerance for each X and Y
Last edited by sscandlon; 04-03-2019, 12:47 PM.
-
Linear resultant values do not correlate with positional tolerance, so no ± 0.003" linear does not encompass pass/fail of true position.
(0.003" TP is a circular tolerance zone, x/y ±0.003" is square)
That's why you shouldn't apply tolerances to the basic, because the linear position has capability of (appearing to) accept a bad part. (EX if your variation in X is 0.0025 and your variation in Y is 0.001", your TP result is 0.0054" out of spec.)Last edited by louisd; 04-03-2019, 02:01 PM.
-
ok so how do I ensure I am take the dimension of the true position correctly. Attached are my FCF for 3 of the pin holes of the same size as well as the report
-
-
As long as your nominal value for the pin holes match the X and Y BASIC dimensions on the print, and your datums are defined, setup, and referenced properly, it's accurate.
--Double check on a rock with an indicator, or put part on a comparator if you don't trust the results.
Comment
-
Need to know where to manually correct your nominals? read what I suggested to you the other day. I mean, you can do it in summary mode, it's just buried.
one last thing. switch your edit window layout from "Summary mode" to "Command Mode" now (at bottom of "View" dropdown), and stick with learning in command mode. It is just so much easier to read and understand.
Comment
Related Topics
Collapse
-
by mattfurtawI have recieved a report from an individual that is applying extra tolerance to a datum to allow for additional MMC. I was told that PC DMIS does not...
-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
11-09-2010, 01:20 PM -
-
by cmm-measurer
I received a report from a vendor where they are showing everything on a part 100% in tolerance. I have checked the part myself and show quite...
-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
12-09-2010, 09:57 AM -
-
by RUSSELLWe are using Pcdmis 3.5
Most prints callout true position as total tolerance eg. .01
The dimensioning window for tp asks for + and - tolerance....-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
08-24-2006, 04:47 PM -
-
by wacunaHow does pcdmis calculate the bonus tolerance, when one of the datums has MMC applied to it?
-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
12-07-2007, 03:30 PM -
-
by ttressHello,
I am trying to create a true position command using FCF. I have a MMC on Datum B. Datum A is the surface perpendicular to the hole...-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
02-13-2015, 12:31 PM -
Comment