Our last Quality Manager whipped up a handy little script that outputs a CSV file of the measurement results for a part. Unfortunately, the programs he developed it around were fairly simple, and we now want to use this output on all parts.
He was able to build it so that it would ignore any dimension commands that had an output of 'NONE' (which PCD2EXCEL apparently does not?). My problem arises with other more complex programs, that measure/don't measure various features based on which Operation is being inspected/in-process vs final dimensions/optional Operator input.
For instance, for one part (Airfoil) there is a Dovetail/General Features inspection for Op 45 (Dovetail only), Op 65 (additional Root features), and Op 105 (Final Inspection including both). The way our script currently runs, whichever Operation is run, the PDF report has all of the proper dimensions for that Op, but the CSV output has them all in tandem, and the dimensions for the OPs that didn't actually run will often be out of tolerance (especially scanned features).
The main thing they are trying to use this for is to compile a report of part serial #'s that are in tolerance, and ready to ship to customer/outside services (but we are developing it into other uses). Having these unmeasured dimensions included is obviously putting a kink in efforts to use the CSV files to look for blueprint parts.
Is there another way to do this? I could swear CSV output was standard when I first used PC-DMIS about 20 years ago (took a break for about 13 years), why would they get rid of it? We are currently running 2011 MR1 (X4), 2013 MR1 (X3), and 2017 R2 (X1). Essentially, I just want to put out the same report that I'm printing to PDF in CSV/Excel format.
Any ideas? Thanks in advance!
He was able to build it so that it would ignore any dimension commands that had an output of 'NONE' (which PCD2EXCEL apparently does not?). My problem arises with other more complex programs, that measure/don't measure various features based on which Operation is being inspected/in-process vs final dimensions/optional Operator input.
For instance, for one part (Airfoil) there is a Dovetail/General Features inspection for Op 45 (Dovetail only), Op 65 (additional Root features), and Op 105 (Final Inspection including both). The way our script currently runs, whichever Operation is run, the PDF report has all of the proper dimensions for that Op, but the CSV output has them all in tandem, and the dimensions for the OPs that didn't actually run will often be out of tolerance (especially scanned features).
The main thing they are trying to use this for is to compile a report of part serial #'s that are in tolerance, and ready to ship to customer/outside services (but we are developing it into other uses). Having these unmeasured dimensions included is obviously putting a kink in efforts to use the CSV files to look for blueprint parts.
Is there another way to do this? I could swear CSV output was standard when I first used PC-DMIS about 20 years ago (took a break for about 13 years), why would they get rid of it? We are currently running 2011 MR1 (X4), 2013 MR1 (X3), and 2017 R2 (X1). Essentially, I just want to put out the same report that I'm printing to PDF in CSV/Excel format.
Any ideas? Thanks in advance!
Comment