I need help on how to best approach this...I have a finish print with a finish CAD model, but I am to program it to the rough state. When I align everything to the CAD Model, my nominal match the prints, but when I run the Rough part, it doesn't match anymore. My question is how do I change my numbers so that I can use this program to check the rough part? Should I change my theoretical to match the rough theoretical? or how should I go about using a finish cad to program for a rough part? Thanks in advance!
Finish CAD and Rough machine part
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
If you know there is 2mm of extra material on you can also add that thickness to your features and keep the same vectors etc.Comment
-
How do I adjust finish CAD nominal? Pro-E before loading the CAD Model?
How do I adjust the tolerances to allow for the rough machine? Should I used offsets in my alignments?
I can program without CAD, but there are some holes at a compound angles that I like the cad model for"I saw that!!!" KarmaComment
-
I like to know if I need to include that on my alignment. Example, if I know that finish has .015" less material on X+ axis, can I just make the offset in my alignment X translate at -.015?"I saw that!!!" KarmaComment
-
If you know that there is supposed to be a specific amount of material left on the rough part, then you can use the Auto-feature "Thickness" option, set to THEO and put in the material offset. If the rough material is more of a suggestion (ie "leave .010 to .030 material) then this won't work so well.
I'd guess that you're not expected to treat this as a finished part, but that this is just a machining in process verification? If it is, you might be better off using whatever finished features you do have as you alignment, in order to report out those machined features to themselves, and then the rough sections to the finished features. That would require some more communication with engineering/machining to see what is actually needed at this point."This is my word... and as such is beyond contestation."Comment
-
Whenever I'm in this situation I just transform the cad model. So say we are leaving .030" on the face that im picking up, I just transform the model so the trihedran is sitting .030 above the model. Only disadvantage is when you pick points on that face you'll have to adjust the points from .030 back to 0👍 1Comment
-
Whenever I'm in this situation I just transform the cad model. So say we are leaving .030" on the face that im picking up, I just transform the model so the trihedran is sitting .030 above the model. Only disadvantage is when you pick points on that face you'll have to adjust the points from .030 back to 0"I saw that!!!" KarmaComment
-
I transform the cad model to match my rough nominal and everything fall into place nicely. Thanks everyone!"I saw that!!!" KarmaComment
Related Topics
Collapse
-
by silvioHi everybody,
I am starting to use our new acquired CMM arm. My question is about the use of the imported CAD model in PC-DMIS measurement...-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
08-14-2019, 07:43 AM -
-
by UnderspecHaven't used CAD much. Need help measuring CAD model. Do I need to create alignments first? Also, my probe seems to be in the wrong vector when measuring...
-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
05-24-2007, 09:33 AM -
-
by Ken8282So I was just asked if I could program from a cad model only. Is there anything special I need to know.
-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
02-19-2013, 10:56 AM -
-
Hello group members,
I recently got a cad model for my CMM program from the engineer at work and the orientation of the part is off. So my...-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
07-11-2021, 11:56 AM -
-
by Joe Arnoldcan a cad model be inserted into programs written without the model ?
Are there too many issues to deal with that make it not worth the bother...-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
06-25-2008, 04:19 PM -
Comment