Here is my question. I am trying to edit an existing program to run on a very similar part. The part is oriented such that the majority of the differences are in the Y-axis. On many of the features I have done the following.
Originally aligned y=0 to the y-minus face of the part (A1).
Then, measured a bore (feat 1) on the side of the part at y=1.06
Aligned y=0 to feat 1 (A2).
Measured concentric bores within feat 1 (feat 2,3) (x=x, y=0, z=0)
Now, My new part has feat 1 at y=.86
So, I go in and change the nominals of feat 1 to .86 and re-generate the hits. When I do this the only "warning" I get is "Do you want to update the nominals of the related dimensions?" So, then I am thinking that A2 should make the other features runable since they are in the same relation to feat 1 as on the original part. If you scroll through the program they look good (x=x, y=0, z=0).
Next step is to run the program. Feat 1 runs fine but then when it moves on to the other features they are all .2 off (x=x, y=.2, z=0).
Is there a way to get them to stay at x=x, y=0, z=0?
Originally aligned y=0 to the y-minus face of the part (A1).
Then, measured a bore (feat 1) on the side of the part at y=1.06
Aligned y=0 to feat 1 (A2).
Measured concentric bores within feat 1 (feat 2,3) (x=x, y=0, z=0)
Now, My new part has feat 1 at y=.86
So, I go in and change the nominals of feat 1 to .86 and re-generate the hits. When I do this the only "warning" I get is "Do you want to update the nominals of the related dimensions?" So, then I am thinking that A2 should make the other features runable since they are in the same relation to feat 1 as on the original part. If you scroll through the program they look good (x=x, y=0, z=0).
Next step is to run the program. Feat 1 runs fine but then when it moves on to the other features they are all .2 off (x=x, y=.2, z=0).
Is there a way to get them to stay at x=x, y=0, z=0?
Comment