Right now I'm using PCDMIS CAD++ 3.7 MR3 Brown and sharp Global Image machine. I was wondering if it would be beneficiary to upgrade. What are the pros and cons. what can I expect to gain from it, or is it a case of if it aint broke don't fix it.
Thinking of upgading
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by wicked_tattoo View PostI would maybe upgrade to 3.7MR4 but i would stay with 3.7 series if you asre comfortable with it. The 4 series imo is just to many extras for nothing. Just my 2cents.But then agian I've been out of the loop for a year.
sigpicTHE TASK AHEAD OF YOU, IS NEVER AS GREAT AS THE POWER BEHIND YOU. I Fight for Freedom and Pray For Peace..
Comment
-
Originally posted by why me View PostI Wasn't aware the 3.7 even had a MR4But then agian I've been out of the loop for a year.
sigpic
Originally posted by AndersII've got one from September 2006 (bug ticket) which has finally been fixed in 2013.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Matthew D. Hoedeman View PostANYONE who has a 'legal' install of V3.7, no matter WHEN their SMA went out can download and install MR4 and use it. Apparently they screwed up the STEP translator pretty bad (but I think it only effects UG Step files, but I am NOT sure) and made MR4 installable for anyone whose SMA was current when V3.7 came out. At least, this is the way it was explained when it was released. If this is still the case, I do not know. ALSO, no matter how much we begged and demanded, we could NOT get an answer on HOW MUCH error there was or even ANY figure of how much has been seen. Of course, this is a big benefit to those whose SMA went away anytime after V3.7 was released, but it might also have been a HUGE disaster for ALL OF US since this MR4 came out WAY aver multiple V4 releases, so this issue has been floating around in Pcdmisland for a LONG TIME!sigpicTHE TASK AHEAD OF YOU, IS NEVER AS GREAT AS THE POWER BEHIND YOU. I Fight for Freedom and Pray For Peace..
Comment
-
Originally posted by why me View PostSo in short I should at least go to MR4?sigpic
Originally posted by AndersII've got one from September 2006 (bug ticket) which has finally been fixed in 2013.
Comment
-
Thanks For the info. I was kinda ify at best but I do get in step files allot from one of the customers so I guess I'll go for the MR4sigpicTHE TASK AHEAD OF YOU, IS NEVER AS GREAT AS THE POWER BEHIND YOU. I Fight for Freedom and Pray For Peace..
Comment
-
Hmmm - I was thinking of upgrading to 4.X for my new years resolution.
I am currently using 3.5 as that is what I had been using for the previous few years. Perhaps 3.7 MR4 might be a better resolution for 2009.
I have the 4.2 version that I use on the rare occasions I need the Perceptron laser.
Is 3.7 the preferred version for some reason?
I would appreciate more thoughts / discussion on this as well...
-OO-
Comment
-
Originally posted by why me View PostWowthat bad Huh
And thats without the learning curve for the new buttons,tools,windows and enhancements.
Currently I'm at 3.7 mr3 and losing a battle to avoid 4.3 mr1.... I don't like myself much right now. Realistically I need harmony between machines and I have 3 ( of 5 systems ) that won't run below 4.x
Comment
-
Originally posted by Matthew D. Hoedeman View PostANYONE who has a 'legal' install of V3.7, no matter WHEN their SMA went out can download and install MR4 and use it.
Does this apply to v3.7 ONLY? Because it won't let me install the latest .dll for v4.3. I tried this morning.
We paid the SMA for both of our machines last year…we are still waiting after many phone calls. Can't wait to get my hands on v4.31.
(Hexagon’s [email protected]#^a^&ma$% [email protected]##s a w*&%^[email protected]#$%re.)
Comment
-
Originally posted by lambo View PostDoes this apply to v3.7 ONLY? Because it won't let me install the latest .dll for v4.3. I tried this morning.
We paid the SMA for both of our machines last year…we are still waiting after many phone calls. Can't wait to get my hands on v4.31.
(Hexagon’s [email protected]#^a^&ma$% [email protected]##s a w*&%^[email protected]#$%re.)
Comment
-
Originally posted by mcronus View PostHmmm - I was thinking of upgrading to 4.X for my new years resolution.
I am currently using 3.5 as that is what I had been using for the previous few years. Perhaps 3.7 MR4 might be a better resolution for 2009.
I have the 4.2 version that I use on the rare occasions I need the Perceptron laser.
Is 3.7 the preferred version for some reason?
I would appreciate more thoughts / discussion on this as well...
-OO-
Originally posted by Ironhoe View Postmainly program migration for me... a lot of my programs go "outside the box" for solutions to dimensions. Variables, parametrics, formulas, things of that nature and no one knows EXACTLY what the impact of a migration is going to be in an upgrade. Sometimes its ok and sometimes its abject failure...
And thats without the learning curve for the new buttons,tools,windows and enhancements.
Currently I'm at 3.7 mr3 and losing a battle to avoid 4.3 mr1.... I don't like myself much right now. Realistically I need harmony between machines and I have 3 ( of 5 systems ) that won't run below 4.xsigpic"Hated by Many, Loved by Few" _ A.B. - Stone brewery
Comment
Related Topics
Collapse
-
by Mike BoeroOne of our plants just upgraded to 3.7 Mr3 from 3.5. Now they say when running old programs the programs will run half way through and stop running and...
-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
09-12-2011, 12:22 PM -
-
by vajncWe have installed PC-dmis 3.7, on new workstation with xp 64, but program is not working properly as it should. Occasionally it crushes. Before we had...
-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
01-22-2010, 05:38 AM -
-
by R.AlwardI have 3.7 MR2. I had to update from MR1 just to get my dimensions to work correctly. How is MR3. Does it have more bugs or less. Is it worth upgrading...
-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
04-06-2006, 03:54 PM -
-
by Sean SteeleWhy would someone pay the exorbitant amount of money that Wilcox/BnS charges for the SMA and then not use any version that has come out since 3.5 MR2?...
-
Channel: PC-DMIS for CMMs
07-25-2006, 07:25 PM -
Comment