Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Concentricity, how can I get a proper reading?

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    • Additional Information
      • Years CMM Experience:
      • 1
      • Software Version:
      • 2011 MR1C
      • Machine Type:
      • Romer Arm
      • Job Function:
      • Set Up Programmer
    BWood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    7

    Default Concentricity, how can I get a proper reading?

    So, I am using a romer arm to measure concentricity of two holes. With a traditional CMM (and different software) we have found the concentricity of the holes to be 0.26mm. However, with the romer arm it shows the concentricity to be 2.9mm. If you take the acuals from the two holes and calculate the concentricity it should read like the traditional CMM???? Why is PC DMIS not giving me the correct reading? Any suggestions on how to measure this dimension with the Romer ARM?

  2. #2
    PC-DMIS Guru
    • Additional Information
      • Years CMM Experience:
      • since 1998
      • Software Version:
      • 2011 & 2011mr1 (who said I was sane?)
      • Machine Type:
      • B&S Xcel 9-15-9 & Global Advantage 12-30-10
      • Location:
      • Houston, Texas
      • Job Function:
      • CMM Programmer/Inspector
    Wes Cisco's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    3,250

    Alien

    Quote Originally Posted by BWood View Post
    So, I am using a romer arm to measure concentricity of two holes. With a traditional CMM (and different software) we have found the concentricity of the holes to be 0.26mm. However, with the romer arm it shows the concentricity to be 2.9mm. If you take the acuals from the two holes and calculate the concentricity it should read like the traditional CMM???? Why is PC DMIS not giving me the correct reading? Any suggestions on how to measure this dimension with the Romer ARM?


    A nice fat Friday the 13th softball? Sure. . . I'll take a swing. . .


    Pc-Dmis does not calculate concentricity properly per ASMEY 14.5M 1994/2009. The only way to properly check concentricity per the standard requires the part to be rotated about the datum axis and two dial indicators applied to the surface of the feature being evaluated.

    But fear not! Most of the time when the concentricity symbol is placed on a drawing it is used incorrectly and what the designer is really trying to control is position.

    Pc-Dmis treats concentricity as if it were position.

    There are exactly 42,555,069 posts to date about concentricity on various CMM forums should you care to spend the rest of the day reading about exactly why CMMs can't "do" concentricity right, and elaborate possible ways to get sorta close with a CMM.

    HTH (Hope This Helps)
    "Hated by Many, Loved by Few" _ A.B. - Stone brewery

  3. #3
    Ultra Senior Member
    • Additional Information
      • Years CMM Experience:
      • 25+
      • Software Version:
      • 2010MR3
      • Machine Type:
      • Numerous bridge style
      • Location:
      • DFW area
      • Job Function:
      • CMM programmer

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    DFW area
    Posts
    787

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wes Cisco View Post
    But fear not! Most of the time when the concentricity symbol is placed on a drawing it is used incorrectly and what the designer is really trying to control is position.
    Hey - this symbol shows 2 circles on the same centerline - that's exactly what I need! What's this called...... concentricity? I'm using that!

    Seriously though, you are right. It's a rare case where concentricity could not be replaced by position or runout.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    • Additional Information
      • Years CMM Experience:
      • 6
      • Software Version:
      • PC-DMIS 2013
      • Machine Type:
      • Brown and Sharpe, Leitz, Romer, etc
      • Location:
      • Dallas, TX
      • Job Function:
      • Hexagon Applications Engineer

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Dallas, TX
    Posts
    146

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BWood View Post
    So, I am using a romer arm to measure concentricity of two holes. With a traditional CMM (and different software) we have found the concentricity of the holes to be 0.26mm. However, with the romer arm it shows the concentricity to be 2.9mm. If you take the acuals from the two holes and calculate the concentricity it should read like the traditional CMM???? Why is PC DMIS not giving me the correct reading? Any suggestions on how to measure this dimension with the Romer ARM?
    I've seen a lot of falsely designed concentricities in my time. Make sure you're leveling correctly, or you risk the following:

    skew ex.jpg

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    • Additional Information
      • Years CMM Experience:
      • 1
      • Software Version:
      • 2011 MR1C
      • Machine Type:
      • Romer Arm
      • Job Function:
      • Set Up Programmer
    BWood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    7

    Default

    Unfortunately, the call out is a true concentricity. S, I guess I will have to go to my management group and tell them that the $60,000 we spent on this equipment is not capable of a simple concentricity check
    In a couple of the 42 million posts, there is comment about using code to make up the check. Do you know how to make this happen?

    Mr.T.jpg

  6. #6
    has received PC-DMIS total consciousness
    • Additional Information
      • Years CMM Experience:
      • Since 1988
      • Software Version:
      • V3.7 MR3 (have V3.2063 to V2012)
      • Machine Type:
      • B&S Validator
      • Location:
      • He||
      • Job Function:
      • Inspector - Programmer - all around flunky
    Matthew D. Hoedeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    He||
    Posts
    11,128

    Default

    Why not try CYLINDERS instead of just circles?

    As for the cost of the equipment.... that thing is a MANUAL machine. You must control it, it will not do it for you, and all it takes is a little slop on the part of the operator and all the data is bogus.

    Quote Originally Posted by AndersI View Post
    I've got one from September 2006 (bug ticket) which has finally been fixed in 2013.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    • Additional Information
      • Years CMM Experience:
      • 12
      • Software Version:
      • 2010 MR3, 2011MR1
      • Machine Type:
      • DEA Scirocco 15-10-9, B&S Xcel 7-10-7, B&S PFX 7-6-5, Romer 3m Arm w/ laser
      • Location:
      • In a three day bender
      • Job Function:
      • Quality Engineer / CMM Programmer
    dccfreak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    In a three day bender
    Posts
    138

    Default

    Might be a dumb question, but are you selecting your features in the correct order? For example, the "datum" feature should be chosen second or PC-DMIS will calculate the results really funky. Also, if you're using an arm, have you made sure to set the proper probe comp by taking your first feature hit perpendicular to the surface? Not trying to be a wise guy, or doubt your skill, but I've seen these two factors come into play way too many times. Unless you're hammering the probe along your path, I would definitely excpect better results than those you reported.
    DCCFreak

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    • Additional Information
      • Years CMM Experience:
      • 1
      • Software Version:
      • 2011 MR1C
      • Machine Type:
      • Romer Arm
      • Job Function:
      • Set Up Programmer
    BWood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    7

    Default

    I'll try selecting the datum feature secondly; however, from Wes's response, I thought I couldn't check concentricity with PC DMIS??? Thanks for the input. I understand the proper way to take the hits on the part. We just changed software from Power Inspect to PC DMIS and I am still working on the programming side of the software. Thanks.

  9. #9
    PC-DMIS demi-Guru
    • Additional Information
      • Years CMM Experience:
      • Toolmaker 30+ yr / CMM 10+
      • Software Version:
      • cad++ 2009
      • Machine Type:
      • DEA MISTRAL
      • Location:
      • Rah Cha Cha NY (Rochester NY)
      • Job Function:
      • Layout Inspection/Programmer
    dph51's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Rah Cha Cha NY (Rochester NY)
    Posts
    2,188

    Default

    You can check concentricity with PCDMIS, BUT it reports it according to ISO standards. That is, it reports concentricity as TP (position).

    Lots of luck.

    DEA MISTRAL/PCDMIS CAD++ V2009 MR1

    Post some code. I left my f*•%#ing crystal ball at home.

    I actually don't think that it is that difficult.

Similar Threads

  1. Proper Way to Inspect Part per Concentricity Callout?
    By CarbideEVO in forum PC-DMIS for CMMs
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-30-2011, 02:58 PM
  2. Proper Datum Set-up
    By sharney in forum PC-DMIS for CMMs
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-07-2010, 02:14 PM
  3. Proper datum creation
    By DeWain Hodge in forum PC-DMIS for CMMs
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 09-30-2010, 12:43 PM
  4. proper alignment question
    By j.gonzalez in forum PC-DMIS for CMMs
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 04-03-2009, 02:49 AM
  5. proper way to dimension......
    By Mark Farren in forum PC-DMIS for CMMs
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 08-29-2006, 05:28 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •